- ProblemOrders shipped with the wrong label
- Why?The packer took the label from the wrong pile
- Why?Two label types sit in the same tray
- Why?A new product was added without a new tray
- Why?Product launches have no packing-area check
Root causeNo packing-area step in the product launch process
CountermeasureAdd a packing check to the launch checklist, with one tray per label
A good root cause analysis example shows a clear problem and a chain of causes backed by evidence. It ends with a root cause statement and a countermeasure that prevents recurrence. This guide gives six root cause analysis samples, each using a different technique.
All six are illustrative examples written to show the method. They are not real company cases, and the numbers are invented for teaching.
Each example is drawn as the diagram its technique produces. The one-page template, worksheets for 5 Whys, fishbone and is/is-not, and an Excel version with a Pareto sheet are free to download at the end.
Key takeaways
A root cause is a process condition you can change that, if fixed, stops the problem coming back.
Different problems suit different root cause analysis techniques: 5 Whys, fishbone, is/is-not, fault tree, Pareto and 8D.
Each example here follows the same order: problem, method, chain of causes, root cause statement, countermeasure.
A strong root cause statement describes a cause in the system, never a person's failing.
Verify each cause with evidence before acting on it.
What does a good root cause analysis look like?
A good root cause analysis defines the problem precisely and tests each cause against evidence. It stops at a cause the team can control and ends with a countermeasure and a check. The write-up is short enough to read in a few minutes.
Fixing symptoms instead of causes has a measurable cost. In a NIST survey of US manufacturers, plants that relied most on reactive maintenance, fixing equipment after it fails, had 3.3 times more downtime and 16 times more defects than plants that relied on it least.
The types of root cause analysis differ in how they find causes. Sequential methods such as 5 Whys follow one chain. Diagram methods such as fishbone and fault trees map many possible causes. Data methods such as Pareto charts show which problem to attack first.
Many teams record the result on an A3 report. See the guide to A3 problem solving, and the root cause analysis page for the full overview.
Which technique fits which problem
5 Whys
A single, repeatable failure you can see, like a machine fault.
Example 1 below
Fishbone
There are many possible causes to sort before testing.
Example 2 below
Is/is-not
A fault appears in some places, batches or times and not in others.
Example 3 below
Fault tree
A failure needs several things to go wrong together, as in safety or IT systems.
Example 4 below
Pareto chart
There are many problem types and you need to pick the biggest first.
Example 5 below
8D
A customer complaint needs formal containment, a team and a written report.
Example 6 below
Techniques also combine. A Pareto chart picks the problem, a fishbone lists candidate causes, and 5 Whys follows the strongest one down.
Example 1: machine stoppage with 5 Whys
Problem
A packing machine stops about three times a shift because the sealing jaw jams.
Method
5 Whys, asked at the machine.
- Why 1
The jaw jams because film is out of position.
- Why 2
The film shifts because the feed roller slips.
- Why 3
The roller slips because its surface is worn and glazed.
- Why 4
The surface is worn because replacement is not on any schedule.
- Why 5
There is no schedule because the roller was never listed as a wear part.
Root cause statement
The roller has no planned replacement because it is missing from the preventive maintenance list.
Countermeasure
Add the roller to the list with a replacement interval, then check stoppages weekly for a month.
A blank 5 Whys worksheet with room for the evidence behind each answer.
Worksheet (PDF)Workbook (.xlsx)Example 2: late deliveries in an office with a fishbone
Problem
A back-office team sends about one in five customer quotes after the promised date.
Method
A fishbone diagram, with the team listing causes under people, method, tools, information and environment.
The group tests each branch against ten late quotes. Seven of them waited for pricing approval, and the approval request had no owner or due date. Approvers received it by general email and checked it only once a day.
Root cause statement
Quotes are late because pricing approval requests have no named approver or time limit.
Countermeasure
Route requests to a named person with a four-hour response standard and a visible queue.
A blank fishbone with the five categories from this example, ready to print large.
Worksheet (PDF)Workbook (.xlsx)Example 3: software outage with a fault tree
Problem
An online booking service went down for 45 minutes.
Method
A fault tree, which starts at the failure and branches downward into the combinations of events that could cause it.
The service failed because both database connections were unavailable. The first failed on a certificate expiry. The second failed because the backup used the same certificate, so one expiry removed both paths.
Root cause statement
The backup connection shared the certificate of the main one, and no alert warned of its expiry.
Countermeasure
Use separate certificates and add an expiry alert 30 days ahead. Bell Labs developed fault tree analysis in the early 1960s for missile safety work.
Process gaps are a common root cause in outages. In the Uptime Institute's 2025 outage analysis, 85% of major data center outages caused by human error stemmed from staff not following procedures, or from flaws in the procedures themselves.
Example 4: clinic waiting times with a Pareto chart
Problem
Patients at a small clinic wait too long before seeing a nurse.
Method
A Pareto chart, which counts causes and ranks them so the biggest few are tackled first.
Staff log the reason for each of 100 long waits. Missing registration details account for 46, nurse room not ready for 25, late arrival of patients for 15, and other reasons for 14. The registration problem comes from paper forms left incomplete at the front desk.
Root cause statement
Registrations are incomplete because the form allows submission with required fields blank.
Countermeasure
Make required fields mandatory at check-in, then re-run the count after two weeks.
Healthcare organizations run root cause analyses on serious events too. The Joint Commission reviewed 1,411 sentinel events in 2023, and falls made up 48% of them.
The workbook's Pareto sheet sorts your counts and draws this chart for you.
Workbook (.xlsx)Example 5: label complaint with is/is-not analysis
Problem
A customer reports that product labels peel off.
Method
Is/is-not analysis, popularized by Kepner and Tregoe. It compares where and when the fault occurs with where and when it could occur but does not.
The peeling is found on one batch, one filling line and cartons stored near the loading door. It is not found on other lines or other batches. The difference is a new adhesive roll loaded on that line, and cold, damp storage.
Root cause statement
Labels peel because the adhesive roll used on line 2 was not rated for cold, damp storage.
Countermeasure
Specify the adhesive grade on the material standard and add a storage check at goods-in.
Example 6: warehouse picking errors with 8D
Problem
A warehouse ships the wrong item on about two orders in a hundred.
Method
8D, an eight-discipline team method that Ford documented in the late 1980s, covering containment, root cause, corrective action and prevention.
As containment, the team adds a scan check at packing. Analysis shows most errors involve two products stored in adjacent bins with similar packaging. Pickers rely on a visual match, because the bin label shows only a short code.
D1Form the team
Not part of this short example
D2Describe the problem
Wrong item on about 2 orders in 100
D3Contain
Scan check at packing
D4Find the root cause
Look-alike items in adjacent bins, no scan at pick
D5Choose corrective actions
Separate the items, require a scan at the bin
D6Implement and validate
Not part of this short example
D7Prevent recurrence
Review error counts weekly
D8Recognize the team
Not part of this short example
Root cause statement
Picking errors occur because look-alike items sit in adjacent bins with no scan confirmation at pick.
Countermeasure
Separate the items, require a scan at the bin and review error counts weekly. See also poka-yoke.
How to write a root cause statement
Write a root cause analysis statement as a cause-and-effect sentence about a process condition: this problem occurs because this condition exists. Use a simple template and keep it to one sentence.
Test the statement three ways
- Can you verify it with evidence?
- Would fixing it stop the problem?
- Is it a condition, not a person?
The root cause analysis software and CAPA software categories include tools that store such statements and actions.
A one-page root cause template
Copy these ten fields onto one sheet, or onto an A3. Keep each to a few lines.
Root cause analysis, one page
Filled with Example 1: the packing machine
- 1
Problem statement
What, where, when and how much, against the standard.
The line 2 packing machine has stopped about 3 times a shift since 1 September, against a target of under 1. - 2
Scope
What is in and out.
One machine on all shifts. - 3
Containment
What protects the customer now, and who started it.
A full check at packing. - 4
Technique
The method chosen and why.
5 Whys because the failure is mechanical and repeats. - 5
Cause chain
Each cause in order, one line each.
- 1. The jaw jams because film is out of position.
- 2. The film shifts because the feed roller slips.
- 3. The roller slips because its surface is worn and glazed.
- 4. The surface is worn because replacement is not on any schedule.
- 5. There is no schedule because the roller was never listed as a wear part.
- 6
Evidence
How each cause was confirmed.
A photo of the worn roller. - 7
Root cause statement
One sentence: [Problem] happens because [process condition], which allows [mechanism] to occur.
The roller has no planned replacement because it is missing from the preventive maintenance list. - 8
Countermeasure
The change to the process, with an owner and a due date.
Add the roller to the list with a replacement interval.Owner and due date: added by the team. - 9
Check
The measure, the target and the review date.
Stoppages under 1 a shift for 4 weeks in a row. - 10
Standardize
Which document, checklist or training changed, so the fix outlasts the team that made it.
The preventive maintenance list now includes the roller and its replacement interval.
Free downloads
Root cause analysis template and worksheets
The one-page template prints with each field's prompt. The worksheets cover 5 Whys, fishbone and is/is-not. The workbook adds a Pareto sheet that sorts your counts and draws the chart, and an action list.
Common root cause analysis mistakes
The most common mistake is blaming a person, such as operator error, which ends the analysis before the system is examined. Ask why the process let the error happen or go unnoticed.
Another mistake is stopping at a symptom. A jammed machine, a late quote and a wrong pick are effects, so ask why again until you reach a cause you can change.
Teams also act on guesses without evidence, pick a single cause when several combine and skip the check that confirms the fix worked. Going to the real place helps, as the gemba walk checklist shows.
Frequently asked questions
What is a root cause analysis example?
How do you write a root cause analysis?
What are the types of root cause analysis?
What is a root cause analysis statement?
How many whys should a root cause analysis use?
Is there a root cause analysis template?
Choosing Root Cause Analysis Software?
Read the buying guide: what to look for, mistakes to avoid and questions to ask vendors.
Related guides
- Gemba walk checklist: questions, form and routinesA gemba walk checklist with before, during and after steps, question sets for flow, safety and quality, and a free printable gemba walk form and question cards.Read the guide
- How to write an A3 report: step by step, with an exampleHow to write an A3 report section by section, with a filled A3 example, coaching questions for each box and a free printable A3 template.Read the guide
- FMEA: failure mode and effects analysis, step by stepFMEA explained: worksheet columns, eight steps, scoring severity, occurrence and detection, RPN vs action priority, examples and a free FMEA template.Read the guide
- Control charts: types, how to read them and examplesControl charts explained: the center line and limits, common vs special cause, which chart fits your data, the signals to look for and mistakes to avoid.Read the guide
Sources
Books and papers show their publication year. Web pages show the month we last checked them.
- 1.Taiichi Ohno, Toyota Production System: Beyond Large-Scale Production (Productivity Press, 1988)
- 2.Kaoru Ishikawa, Introduction to Quality Control (3A Corporation, 1990)
- 3.Durward K. Sobek II and Art Smalley, Understanding A3 Thinking: A Critical Component of Toyota's PDCA Management System (Productivity Press, 2008)
- 4.Charles H. Kepner and Benjamin B. Tregoe, The Rational Manager (McGraw-Hill, 1965)
- 5.Clifton A. Ericson II, Fault Tree Analysis: A History (Proceedings of the 17th International System Safety Conference, 1999)
- 6.Douglas S. Thomas and Brian A. Weiss, NIST, Economics of Manufacturing Machinery Maintenance: A Survey and Analysis of U.S. Costs and Benefits (NIST AMS 100-34) (nist.gov, checked October 2026)
- 7.Uptime Institute, Uptime Announces Annual Outage Analysis Report 2025 (uptimeinstitute.com, May 2025)
- 8.The Joint Commission, Now available: 2023 Sentinel Event Data Annual Report (jointcommission.org, May 2024)